[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn revert' vs. 'svn resolve'

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-06-10 18:18:12 CEST

On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 11:59, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I find myself mostly agreeing with cmike here... I don't like the idea
> of a prompt, but how about requiring --force to revert a conflicted
> file? Has that been suggested and tossed out already? I can't recall.

Yes, it has. It feels like a terrible semantic to me. "This
data-destroying operation is deemed more dangerous than all the other
data-destroying things I do, solely because there's a similar command
name and you might have mistyped it" seems like it's taken right out of
the Crazy Spaghetti School of User Interface Design.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 10 18:19:18 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.