[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn revert' vs. 'svn resolve'

From: Chris Stork <cstork_at_ics.uci.edu>
Date: 2003-06-09 07:35:44 CEST

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:30:44PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> In a fit of anticipatory consensus (or others might call it
> "chest-beating geekismo"), I've changed the command to 'svn undo' in
> revision 6173.

Hmm, to the uninitiated "undo" means undo the last svn command. "abort"
would mean a currently running svn command could be interrupted this
way. Not good either (even though it was my suggestion ;).

But Luke's "abandon" does not have any previous connotations and it
pretty much fits the picture as in "abandon these changes".

[I'll shut up now before I get into the hues.]

Chris Stork (PhD student at UC Irvine)  http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069  021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 9 07:36:29 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.