On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:49:48PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>...
> > > > # rpm -Uh httpd-2.0.45-0.2.i386.rpm
> > > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > > httpd-mmn = 20020628 is needed by (installed) mod_perl-1.99_07-5
> > > > httpd-mmn = 20020628 is needed by (installed) mod_python-3.0.1-3
> > > > httpd-mmn = 20020628 is needed by (installed) php-4.2.2-17
> > > > httpd-mmn = 20020628 is needed by (installed) mod_ssl-2.0.40-21.3
> > > > libapr.so.0 is needed by (installed) mod_perl-1.99_07-5
> > > > libaprutil.so.0 is needed by (installed) mod_perl-1.99_07-5
> > > > # rpm -ivh mod_ssl-2.0.45-0.2.i386.rpm
> > > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > > httpd-mmn = 20021106 is needed by mod_ssl-2.0.45-0.2
>
> David, I presume these are your packages - the httpd-mmn provide for
> 2.0.45 should be 20020903, if you just pick a random date for this your
> packages won't be compatible with anyone else packaging httpd RPMs.
> You might want to resync against our 2.0.45 package in Raw Hide:
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.45-9.src.rpm
Good advice, Joe.
FYI, all, that 20020903 number comes from httpd-2.0/include/ap_mmn.h. It is
used to specify the binary compatibility of Apache.
The header file says that 20020903 was introduced for 2.0.41, but I wouldn't
trust binary compatibility back that far. The httpd dev group really only
started explicitly forcing binary compat starting with the 2.0.44 release.
Source compatibility back to 2.0.41 should be fine.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jun 8 00:38:08 2003