Re: svn commit: rev 6161 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs

From: Glenn A. Thompson <gthompson_at_cdr.net>
Date: 2003-06-06 17:36:49 CEST

Hey,

>
>+1 on Joe's commit of rev 6161, though. There was a bug, and he fixed
>it. We can certainly tweak the fix, if we decide to.
>
>
Joe's fix should stay in no matter what is decided IMO. Why allow
something to break the code when you can figure it out and fix it?
For the purpose of voting I'm +1 for allowing wrapping of deadlocks.
But I do see the other side of the argument.

gat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 6 17:39:46 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Schmitt: "Re: "svn move" broken?"
Previous message: kfogel_at_collab.net: "Re: svn status -v on nonexistent files has changed"
In reply to: kfogel_at_collab.net: "Re: svn commit: rev 6161 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]