Same for me here :) I tried installing subversion back at the 0.14 times
and I desisted. As soon as I found svn debs lying around I migrated all
my cvs repositories to svn and had never had a problem which wasn't
caused by myself.
The last one uncovered a big error from me. I was backing up the entire
/var/lib/svn dir (I mean, no dump's). When I tried to copy one of the
repositories to a redhat box (yeah, that was when I couldn't checkout
with 0.23 due to the new svn+ssh) I got a berkeley db version mismatch.
Im really impressed by the quality subversion has had since a long time.
Whenever we (Oh my, it makes me believe Im part of the "team" just for
using it) reach 1.0 it will be rock solid stable.
Regards,
Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> I can really agree on this, if it were not for the -deb's I wouldn't be
> using subversion right now.
>
> / regards, Lars Segerlund.
>
> Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:31:32AM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm glad to see the smileys :-), but let's not interpret one success
>>> story as proof that the Apache install has suddenly become as easy as
>>> instant pizza. Unless we're also willing to count all the posts we
>>> see about Apache/SVN installation woes as proof of the opposite! :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know, the Debian packages make the install an absolute breeze.
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
--
dharana
www.4unrealers.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 5 18:48:35 2003