[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Which Berkeley version to use? NOT 4.1.x!!!

From: Ben Collins <bcollins_at_debian.org>
Date: 2003-06-05 16:04:51 CEST

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:02:48AM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> David Waite wrote:
> >Not saying whether or not 4.1.x is this much slower or not, but this
> >doesn't seem like a very fair test - 0.22 vs 0.23, 128 MB vs 512 MB.
> I did want to add that caveat as a possible factor, but low memory
> shouldn't cause extra logging, should it? The system was pretty much
> unloaded other than this import, so any thrashing was just the svn server
> processes themselves.

I agree. I would say the logging is the cause of the slowdown.

I would go back and compare 0.23 against 0.23 just to be sure the
logging problem isn't the result of changes in SVN though.

Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 5 17:07:30 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.