[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PATCH] Multi-threaded svnserve

From: D.J. Heap <djheap_at_dhiprovo.com>
Date: 2003-06-02 18:12:07 CEST

Thanks for doing this! (I was looking at it over the weekend a little,
but I'm very glad someone with more apr-fu got it done.)

This is working for me so far (just trying a variety of commands
manually). I'm having trouble invoking the tests correctly on Windows,
though. I've tried 'win-tests.py -r -u svn://localhost/repos
tests-junk' and the repositories are being created down in the
tests-junk directory structure, but the whole path is not being passed
on the url and my various attempts to root svnserve at an appropriate
location aren't working very well. Can someone give me a pointer to the
correct syntax to run the Windows tests on a svn: url?

For the record, the reason we want to use svnserve over Apache is simply
performance. Apache with mod_dav_svn is very powerful and flexible and
really not hard to setup/configure, and it's performance is not bad at
all in general, but it's still 10x worse (or more in some cases) than
svnserve. That is certainly acceptable in lots of cases for us, but in
many it is just too much worse than what we're using now for our users
to accept it without lynching me. Svnserve is almost as fast in most
cases and faster in the rest. We're using SourceSafe, and I want very
badly to get off it, but it's performace on a fast LAN and with a low
number of simultaneous users is quite good. It is almost adequate with
most other things.


-----Original Message-----
From: cmpilato@collab.net [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Philip Martin
Cc: Greg Hudson; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multi-threaded svnserve

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:

> cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > Now I get unresolved symbol, _apr_proc_detach@4. :-)
> >
> > Let's keep banging this out line by line, shall we?
> There doesn't appear to be a Windows implementation of the function
> apr_proc_detach :-( I've made the call conditional (which is how it
> was before I started this multi-thread stuff). I wonder if APR should
> provide APR_HAS_DETACH?

There we go. All compile-y happy now.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 2 18:14:11 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.