[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Some Defects

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-05-30 20:14:44 CEST

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:

> > 2. If for some reason the merge fails and you do a 'svn revert -R
> > .' on the tree to put everything back, files that have been added
> > as part of the merge are not deleted.
> That is how revert is intended to work.


II create a new file, and 'svn add' it. Then I change my mind; I
don't want to put it under version control after all. When I run 'svn
revert', it removes the scheduling only. It would be awful if it
deleted the file -- the data would be gone forever.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 31 01:19:23 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.