[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: dav memory scalability

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim_at_bigfoot.com>
Date: 2003-05-30 13:19:32 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> --On Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:52 PM -0500 Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
> > So I'm bit skeptical at the moment. It doesn't seem that mod_dav's
> > memory usage is a 3-alarm fire anymore. In retrospect, almost every
> > complaint I've heard over the last few months is that "neon times out"
> > when waiting for a large directory to arrive.
> I believe the problem was that SVN clients weren't doing depth:1
> PROPFINDs - that is a new change. Instead we were doing a PROPFIND
> for every file in a directory - I think that exacerbated the leak
> in httpd as there is a per-request leakage. And, I believe that
> some patches have gone in recently to try to change how mod_dav_svn
> used pools to help solve *some* of the problems.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 30 13:16:17 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.