Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> --On Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:52 PM -0500 Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > So I'm bit skeptical at the moment. It doesn't seem that mod_dav's
> > memory usage is a 3-alarm fire anymore. In retrospect, almost every
> > complaint I've heard over the last few months is that "neon times out"
> > when waiting for a large directory to arrive.
>
> I believe the problem was that SVN clients weren't doing depth:1
> PROPFINDs - that is a new change. Instead we were doing a PROPFIND
> for every file in a directory - I think that exacerbated the leak
> in httpd as there is a per-request leakage. And, I believe that
> some patches have gone in recently to try to change how mod_dav_svn
> used pools to help solve *some* of the problems.
>
<URL:http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1179>
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 30 13:16:17 2003