kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:
>
>
>>Currently, in my document, I don't detail what I want to develop for
>>the logging feature. I can spend a little time to propose something
>>here on the list or I can put it in my Pluggable-DB document. Which
>>do you prefer?
>>
>>
>
>I think what I'd most prefer is a patch that gets us better error
>logging in the fs we currently use :-) (but which I'm not in a
>position to implement right now). Pluggable DB is great, but a bit
>far in the future to help w/ Berkeley DB problems in the here-and-now.
>
I don't see the fix being part of the pluggable-db.
It can live by itself. I was merely asking if you wanted me to
elaborate on a logging feature and where to do it.
If you are looking for a quick fix than perhaps my document is the right
place, as it will cut down on near term traffic and I don't see logging
as being a quick fix.
As far as patches are concerned, I'm happy to supply them: will you
apply them unconditionally?
I didn't think so:-)
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 27 21:40:55 2003