[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Why not hide .SVN dir on windows?

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-05-22 23:28:50 CEST

> From: Brian Denny [mailto:brian@briandenny.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 11:07 PM

> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:14:47PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> >
> > -0 on hiding the .svn directories. At least as long as we set the
> > read-only flag. I just did set the hidden flag on the .svn dir and
> > turned off the viewing of hidden files. Surely it disappeared from my
> > view. Then, I decided to get rid of that working copy, and hit Delete
> > on the folder. The user is then presented with:
> >
> > "The file 'dir-prop-base' is a read-only file. Are you sure you want to delete it?"
> >
> > [Yes] [Yes to All] [No] [Cancel]
> >
> >
> > To be presented with something the user doesn't have any knowledge about,
> > and since it is hidden, cannot easily figure out, seems like a bad idea.
>
> you could make the same argument for unix:
>
> % mkdir foo
> % cd foo
> % mkdir .bar
> % cd .bar
> % touch baz
> % chmod -w baz
> % cd ../..
> % ls foo # gives no output
> % rm -r foo
> override r--r--r-- bri/bri for foo/.bar/baz?

You could, but ls -a is a lot closer by than:
(open menu) Tools -> Folder options -> View -> Show hidden files and folders
OK

And, after seeing that there is a .svn going back to the same menu to
disable showing the hidden stuff again. And don't tell me I might aswell
leave the showing of hidden stuff on, because then there is no added value
in hiding.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 22 23:29:46 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.