[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Resolution of 'svn diff' change?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-05-20 16:36:01 CEST

cmpilato@collab.net writes:

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > > Ghudson, I think your proposal has some promise. But for those of us
> > > who are a bit slow-witted, can you demonstrate how your --old/--new
> > > diff syntax would be used to cover all five use-cases I outlined in
> > > the earlier mail? Humour me... :-)
> >
> > 1. show local mods in a working copy
> > svn diff
> > (or: svn diff file1 file2 ..., if only for some files/dirs)
> >
> > 2. compare a wc path with a different version of itself
> > svn diff -r M path
> > (or: svn diff --old=url[@REV] path, to compare against a branch)
> >
> > 3. compare two specific versions of a wc path
> > svn diff -r M:N path
> > (or: svn diff --old=url1[@REV] --new=url2[@REV] path, to compare
> > path in two different branches)
> >
> > 4. compare any two arbitrary repos paths/revs
> > svn diff --old=url1[@REV] --new=url2[@REV]
> >
> > 5. compare a wc path to an arbitrary repos path
> > svn diff --old=url1[@REV] --new=path
>
> You'll get my +1 if you can write a clear, concise usage message.
> You'll get another one if you get to codin'. :-)

Yeah, I have to say, I give it a +1 as well. This is definitely the
Least Evil solution of all that have been brought up.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 20 16:37:28 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.