Re: svn.collab.net is now running Subversion 0.23.

cmpilato@collab.net writes:

> =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
> > >In one week, let's upgrade to Berkeley 4.1.25, what say?
> > >
> >
> > -1
> >
> > Just upgrading BDB, after the fiasco that caused last time, is not a
> > good idea.
>
> Yes yes yes. I've been using 4.1.25 on my laptop for a few weeks now,
> with an outstanding TODO of banging it with stress.pl. While we
> *think* the problems we had with svn.collab.net weren't related to
> BDB, it costs too much to be wrong about such things.

Yuck. I just ran 4 instances of stress.pl. At about revision 125,
two of them pooped out with conflicted commits. I started two more to
replace them and went back to what I was working on. Now, at revision
361, I have two more failed instances (conflicts again), but also two
that are hung.

This significantly reduces the chances of my smiling for the next few
moments.

.
.
.
.

Okay. I'm over it now.

But there is at least something to be examined here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 19 22:26:02 2003