Re: Resolution of 'svn diff' change?

--On Monday, May 19, 2003 3:56 PM +0100 Colin Watson
<cjwatson@flatline.org.uk> wrote:

> wrapper for what they consider a trivial use case, though. I'd
> definitely "vote" for your subcommand option (2a), since that keeps
> ordinary 'svn diff' use consistent whether you're comparing one, two,
> three, or more files between the working copy and the repository. 'svn
> compare' would have no such consistency constraints: it can only compare
> two items.

If another subcommand can keep everyone happy, that's fine with me. But,
asking *everyone* to roll their own wrapper just to match the standard
functionality of CVS seems ludicrous (and not a bikeshed, IMHO). -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 19 17:18:50 2003