Re: Logging granularity

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 09:27:15PM +0200, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:

> That's funny, because exactly the fact that I already followed that
> practice with CVS is the reason why I also want these per-item logs.
> (the CVS logs are more similar to per-items logs than per-commit logs
> when CVS is used this way).

Might it be that your mind is very much influenced by CVS?

> If I want the changes on some file (e.g. "svn log wc/dir/foo.cc"), I
> am absolutely not interested in what else changed (if I was, I would
> effectively call "svn log wc").

"svn log wc/dir/foo.cc" already gives you only the log-entries of the
revisions on which wc/dir/foo.cc was changed. I can't see your point.

> Yes, the question is not to cripple the current Subversion log, but to
> be able to ask for the logs for a single file only, in addition.

This functionality is already existant.

-- 
-- Josef Wolf -- jw@raven.inka.de --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org