Re: Best practise for long term repository size management

Daniel Patterson <danpat@adaptiveinternational.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 00:48, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > I just want to echo Francois' point. Your problem is most likely the
> > Berkeley log files, not the data itself.
> >
> > The BDB program is `db_archive', read about it in the sleepcat docs.
>
> Yes, I'm already doing that. Logfiles aren't really a concern, (they're
> being archived and stored offline), it's the "strings" database file
> that's growing at the 20M/day rate. Given that there is no way to
> shrink that file, or give it an upper bound, what's the best approach to
> manage it's size?

Switch to RTF instead of native Word docs? At least you have a
fighting chance of worthwhile deltification. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 14 03:58:53 2003