Re: iteration pools and 'continue'

Brian Denny wrote:

>On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 12:41:17AM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 23:15, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I guess it depends on the situation... I don't think there's a policy
>>>in place about this. I mean, you could always clear the pool right
>>>before calling 'continue'. But I suspect the reason you see people
>>>not doing that is simply a bit of carelessness, not a deliberate
>>>policy decision. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>Seems like it would be simplest to clear the iteration pools at the
>>beginning of loop bodies, instead of at the end.
>>
>>
>
>I agree.
>
>Anyone object to making this the suggested convention in HACKING?
>
>

I think this gets a big +1, and I suggest someone should file an issue
about finding and fixing all loops where we use iteration pools in this way.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org