Re: [PATCH] eliminate -noproxy flag to SWIG

Greg Stein wrote:
> If the 'svn' package keeps the abbreviated name (rather than the longer
> 'subversion'), then we can definitely arrange to *not* break any users.
>
> So... we can have the 'svn' package import symbols from libsvn. And for FS,
> at least, we can also rename them.

So, do you want me to send a patch for this? We could take everything
else from there, then.

> I believe most of the primary users of the Python bindings are on this list,
> and most are even committers. But we *do* want to provide a bit of time for
> those people to get the code switched over.

Agreed. Compat stuff is okay, I understand the obligations. But worrying
too much about breaking things will keep us from advancing.

Phil

P.S.: gsvn is broken, too and nobody seems to care. The sad thing
actually is that nobody keeps it up-to-date. I expect that to be
different with ViewCVS et.al.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 13 01:51:50 2003