Re: [PATCH] eliminate -noproxy flag to SWIG

Sander Striker wrote:
>>So it is core then. But do we need to keep backward compatability at
>>this time?
>
> Unless you want to break ViewCVS, SubWiki, mailer.py, etc, etc.

I don't but I do want to produce code that makes sense.

If I recall correctly, we're still in 0.X, so people should expect
things to change, especially with something low-prioritized like the
bindings. As Greg said so himself, the bindings as they are now are just
a quick hack go get things working.

When we do the change from svn to libsvn and introduce svn with renamed
symbols, things will utterly break anyway. As a matter of fact, things
will even break when my -noproxy patch is applied because accessors
functions will not be available anymore.

So, if you don't want to break any of the above, you can't improve the
bindings.

Phil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 13 01:27:29 2003