On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 05:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> A better alternative is to go down into some subdirectories and update
> those
> first. That will partition the entire update down to manageable
> pieces. If
> you do some subdirs, then they'll be omitted from the update report
> (since
> the subdir is entirely at rev 2, it is no longer mentioned). Finally,
> after
> some subdirs get updated, then you go back up to the root the WC and
> update
> that.
>
> That's a good "user strategy" to work around the problem. But we should
> still have some fixes in the code...
It's only a good strategy if you really have a nice "tree-shaped"
directory architecture, but if you have a mostly flat source layout,
picking off the one or two low-hanging fruit won't change much. :-/
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 7 23:31:02 2003