RE: doc/book request

> From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]On
> Behalf Of kfogel@collab.net

> "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org> writes:
>>> Now, if we had a keyword for the actual revision of a file, instead of
>>> it's last-changed-rev, this problem would be solved.
>>
>> That would be the thing we are talking about. Ofcourse a WC can't guess
>> at what rev the repository is, if that was what you were reading ;)
>
> Ick :-(. I don't want my working files changing when I run update
> unless they actually received text changes. Can you imagine having
> your editor constantly complaining that foo changed on disk, when you
> didn't commit it, and neither did anyone else?

Then don't use that feature. Besides, it is meant for files that _don't_
get edited that much, since otherwise the LastChangedRevision would work
fine.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 6 21:48:58 2003