[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RA layer change needed?

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-05-06 16:38:41 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > Perhaps we really need a history function, something that returns the
> > revisions and paths at which an item changed. A bit like the verbose
> > log function but without the overhead of the messages or the entries
> > within a directory. A function to tell me the essentials about the
> > path: it changed at revision X, it got copied from here at revision Y.
> I agree. I wonder if we can flesh out a proposed prototype here on
> the list. Adding a new RA function is no trivial matter; I wanna make
> sure the prototype is perfect. :-)

Such a function is already in the works. svn_fs_node_history() has
been on my fs-schema-changes TODO list for some time. It would
essentially replace svn_fs_revisions_changed() (that crufty old piece
of poo), and would return a list of, among potential other things,
real paths and revisions in the ancestry of a node, including those
where a parent directory was copied but the node itself was unchanged.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 6 16:43:08 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.