[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Cannot Build svn 0.21.0 server on Solaris 2.8

From: Chris Foote <Chris.Foote_at_xtra.co.nz>
Date: 2003-05-04 20:20:06 CEST

Try removing the -std=c?? flag to gcc from the Makefile.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "phLi" <phli0@yahoo.com>
To: "Martin_v._L÷wis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
Cc: <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Cannot Build svn 0.21.0 server on Solaris 2.8

> Okay, a couple things.
>
> First, I reinstalled gcc to make sure it was synched with any new headers from
> OS patching. Then I rebuilt apache2 (to get apr and apr-util) and then rebuilt
> subversion. (By rebuilt I mean 'make extraclean' first...)
>
> I still get the same problem as before, but I may have left out one detail in
> my previous description which may be significant. When I build subversion as
> described above, make fails here:
> In file included from subversion/include/svn_pools.h:27,
> from subversion/libsvn_delta/cancel.c:19:
> /usr/local/apache2/include/apr.h:428:2: #error no decision has been made on
> APR_PATH_MAX for your platform
>
> By looking in /usr/include/limits.h, I see that PATH_MAX is (should be) set to
> 1024 if not defined. So if I edit apr.h to set APR_PATH_MAX to 1024 if not
> defined (instead of throwing error) and try to rebuild subversion, THEN I get
> the parse error in signal.h. Perhaps it is a mistake to set APR_PATH_MAX this
> way? Is there something else I should try to correct the "no decision has been
> made on APR_PATH_MAX" error?
>
> If setting APR_PATH_MAX in this way is okay, then I guess I will continue
> trying to determine what is going on with sigset_t by looking at preprocessor
> output.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --- "Martin_v._L÷wis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote:
> > > Thanks for your help - been a decade or so since I've done any real
> > C/C++... I
> > > would like to know the root cause, though, others have not had this problem
> > on
> > > Solaris 2.8 using same apache2/subversion versions. My Solaris box recently
> > had
> > > patches applied, but maybe it still isn't completey patched up? Or is this
> > > possibly an issue with the subversion build process?
> >
> > One possible cause may be that you have patched the system. Everytime a
> > system header changes, the gcc installation may become incorrect.
> >
> > gcc copies a number of header files at installation time, and modifies
> > them. If the system header changes, gcc's copies won't simultaneously
> > change. You have to reinstall gcc, to invoke the "fixincludes" process
> > again.
> >
> > It also may be that some header changes outright break gcc, so that even
> > a re-installation won't help (e.g. when Sun manages to break a system
> > header so that gcc cannot fix it).
> >
> > Notice that reinstalling gcc won't tell you what the problem is. I
> > advise you to study the preprocessor output in more detail, to find out
> > what sys/signal.h got replaced with.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 4 20:23:41 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.