[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: isssue #960 - separate canonical repository URL from repos path in wc

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-05-01 19:36:17 CEST

mark benedetto king <mbk@boredom.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:33:20AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> >
> > > cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > > > This I disagree with. I had always just assumed that we would be
> > > > adding nothing but a single svn_wc_entry_t member (repos_url), and a
> > > > single XML attribute to match that (repos-url). Determining the
> > > > repos_path from the repos_url and url is trivial string math.
> > >
> > > Does it really matter? Both ways work, each is optimized for
> > > different circumstances...
> >
> > It matters in terms of code churn. You could add support for storing
> > this repos_url member today without effecting the rest of the WC code
> > at all.
>
> It makes for twice as much entries-rewriting for switch --relocate, not
> that it really matters, since the entries-file will only be written once.

Huh? Entries files are read and written in full. It doesn't cost
non-trivially more to:

   read and parse a whole file, change two pieces of data, then unparse
   and write the whole file

than it does to:

   read and parse a whole file, change one piece of data, then unparse
   and write the whole file

That said, I'm not the guy writing the code, so dude can do whatever
he sees fit to do.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 1 19:36:53 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.