On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:48:48AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:23 PM -0500 Karl Fogel
> <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> wrote:
>
> >Note that this is not a permanent situation, see
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=951
>
> I thought mbk planned to merge in the 951-dev branch now that the UUID
> changes were in. That was the roadblock before - we couldn't validate the
> UUID. That should be trivial now with the new RA methods.
>
> mbk? If you don't have time, I may be able to stop playing my PS2 long
> enough to do some 'real' work. Darn FFX. ;-) -- justin
A major product release at work has limited my spare time significantly,
and the theft of my laptop has raised the "hactivation" level quite a bit.
Luckily, the release has gone well, and I should be able to set up a new
svn development environment very soon. Go back to your PS2. :-)
The actual merge is trivial, but doing the UUID validation may be tricky,
because we don't currently separate the repository component of the URL
from the path; we'll need to validate that the UUID of each URL being
rewritten is preserved. This realization is what led me to suggest that
the repository URL be removed completely from the WC.
I see now that we can simply do things the hard way for now, and when
issue 960 is resolved, we can streamline the validation procedure. Maybe
one day we'll even remove the URL completely, and obsolete the 951 change.
Given that additional work remains, I plan on merging the trunk into the
951-branch, adding UUID validation, and then merging the branch into
the trunk. Does this make sense?
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 30 20:25:18 2003