Re: Compressed text-base patch
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-04-29 01:38:06 CEST
On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 19:18, rbb@rkbloom.net wrote:
> They all do it.
I think he meant "how many data structures would you really have to add
> The userdata stuff is an aspect of pools, not of the APR
I'm with Eric and Phillip; the current behavior is counterintuitive and
> It makes no sense at all for every APR type to implement the userdata
It may not be your preference, but it certainly makes a kind of sense.
> The pools implement userdata, and all other types get it for free.
Currently, they don't get it for free; they get it at the cost of
> However, if you really want my opinion, the user_data stuff in APR was
Here I agree with you, actually. Object user data is a bit like global
So, I'm -0 on any new uses of user data in svn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.