[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "transaction has active cursors" / "Invalid change ordering" ???

From: Brian Denny <brian_at_briandenny.net>
Date: 2003-04-27 03:28:25 CEST

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:10:54PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Brian Denny <brian@briandenny.net> writes:
> > so, if i am thinking straight:
> >
> > after a successful update, there should be no "missing" items and
> > no "deleted" items -- for every entry, a file or directory should
> > exist. therefore, in [wherever the post-update processing you refer
> > to above happens], we can delete *any* entry whose corresponding
> > file or directory does not exist on disk, whether or not it is marked
> > 'deleted'.
> Sounds right to me! Assuming we reported the wc state correctly, we
> have to trust the server... trust that it has accounted for all
> deltas. Any "stragglers", such as missing or 'deleted' items, need to
> be cleaned up.

so, this seems to work beautifully, except for one thing:
the removal of 'deleted' entries occurs within the recursive helpers of
svn_wc__do_update_cleanup, which doesn't have a notifier and so can't
print the line

D myfile

as i think should happen for 'missing' case. so the cleaning up of
'missing' items will probably have to happen someplace else -- i'm
thinking svn_wc_crawl_revisions...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 27 03:24:49 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.