[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: production ready?

From: <rbraswell_at_connected.com>
Date: 2003-04-21 23:30:45 CEST

Thanks to all for the input!


-----Original Message-----
From: brian@briandenny.net [mailto:brian@briandenny.net]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 5:19 PM
To: fitz@red-bean.com
Cc: rbraswell@connected.com; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: production ready?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 03:19:13PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> rbraswell@connected.com writes:
> > Ok.. So am I better of using CVS until 1.0 ships, or do you feel that a
> > pre-release subversion build is better than the current release of cvs?
> I think that you're better off with a pre-release of Subversion than
> the current release of CVS if you don't mind following the Subversion
> announcements list and upgrading your Subversion installation every
> month or six weeks until it hits 1.0 (and this includes a possible
> repository dump/reload or 2).

a few other things to consider:

- Subversion GUI clients are (as far as i've seen) not yet mature/stable.

- the cvs2svn repository conversion script isn't really ready for prime

Received on Mon Apr 21 23:31:44 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.