Re: svn copy bug in ra_dav?

William Uther <willu.mailingLists@cse.unsw.edu.au> writes:

[description of COPY bug removed]

> I remember people talking about bugs getting things from old revisions
> that didn't exist in head, but I thought that was where it was trying
> to follow copy history, not where it was being given the exact
> revision.

Nah, it's any time the thing doesn't exist in HEAD.

> I am also surprised by the ra_local/ra_dav difference.

Oh, geez. Don't let that be a surprise. Just means you've found a
bug in one of the RA implementations.

These libraries might both start with "ra_", but their implementations
differ wildly. The presence of a network and network protocol adds
whole new layers of pain that ra_local doesn't have to deal with. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 21 15:19:19 2003