[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Which is better to use:(was Re: SVNServe / SSH)

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2003-04-17 04:53:26 CEST

On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Stuart wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:23:38 -0400 Garrett Rooney
> <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Jeff Stuart wrote:
>>> Ok, which is better to use? Better as defined as easy to use, easy
>>> to
>>> secure, faster, less likely to cause corruption to repository, etc?
>>> ra_dav via Apache 2 and SSL or ra_svn via SSH?
>> "it depends (tm)"
>> ;-)
> I should have probably prefaced this with the following: I am
> currently using ra_dav via Apache2 which I currently have. I'm just
> wondering if it makes any sense to switch over to ra_svn.

do you have any complaints about ra_dav and apache2? if not, then why
switch? if you do, then perhaps looking at ra_svn is worthwhile, but i
can't tell you one way or the other if i don't know what problems you
have with ra_dav.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 17 04:54:13 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.