Re: Standardised Repository Schema
From: Jeff Stuart <jstuart_at_computer-city.net>
Date: 2003-04-17 04:26:00 CEST
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:10:04 +1000 "Kim Lester" <kim@dfusion.com.au> wrote:
[...EXCELLENT article on 2 different structures...]
Well, here's what I'm doing. :) Note: let me say this. I'm using SVN to maintain/VC about 10 different websites. I have EACH website as it's own repository. I started out with this structure:
/Trunk
I'm now thinking of having something like this:
/Live
Which map this way: /Live is the what is live and currently being used on a specific website. /Staging is our staging/testing area and everything in staging will be copied to /Live nightly. /Devel is long term development/testing. When a new version of a site is ready to be released, it gets copied to /Staging and we pound on it.
I then plan on having some kind of web pages to handle some of this stuff and also to provide content management where my graphics/HTML folk can upload their stuff and have all that managed also.
Comments, thoughts appreciated. As you can tell, I'm not finished thinking on this at all. :) It could well (and probably will) change as I get into it in more detail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.