"Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org> writes:
> Exactly. This is the reason I want this discussion to continue.
> On the dev@ list, where it is archived and people can read what is
> being thought up. At the same time I can see that this is a
> (potential) massive resource hog. Therefor I suggest that the people
> who don't have the time for this don't read the full threads. Instead
> I (or anyone else) will create a document in notes/, which will be
> amended throughout the discussion. Each time the doc is in a state
> that it could use some review (but no more than twice a month), the
> dev list will be notified and the people low on time can then use their
> precious time efficiently, not having to plough through long threads.
> This will also hopefully have the effect that we don't have to start this
> discussion all over again post 1.0.
Sounds like an excellent compromise (especially since I'm clearly not
going to talk you out of working on this before 1.0, heh :-). Which
is fine.)
See you at the next checkpoint then. Oooh, that has ominous
connotations these days :-(. Uh, I didn't mean it that way, of
course.
Thanks for your understanding, Sander!
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 14 21:51:27 2003