[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merging Improved

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-04-14 06:45:04 CEST

On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 20:23, Tom Lord wrote:
> Yet, under Sander's proposal (making reasonable assumptions about how
> he fleshes out tree-deltas), there is _no_ directory in a project tree
> that reliably records the merge history of that project tree.

Wouldn't the root of the project tree qualify, since changes to files
bubble up through parent directories to the root? (This of course
depends on how tree deltas are fleshed out.)

> Second, are you saying that "CollabNet's commercial interests" do not
> have a significant impact on those core developers who are employed by
> svn or that they do not, in turn, have significant impact on the plans
> for and design of svn?

Given how many times CollabNet has made it clear that it does not want
to determine the design of Subversion or even determine who has commit
access to the project, I don't think you'll have much success going over
the developers' heads to them.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 14 06:45:57 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.