Re: New subversion user report

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>Jonathan Abbey <jonabbey@arlut.utexas.edu> writes:
>
>
>>The nice thing is that cvs2svn did the job fine from the looks of it,
>>all tags got their own subdirs and svn ls and svn cat works great.
>>
>>
>
>Note that those tags are done very inefficiently (way, way too many
>copies). We're going to disable this part of cvs2svn soon, while we
>work on it.
>
>I don't know if this explains the increased size of your repository.
>IIRC, copies duplicate the space of their topmost node (?), and then
>all nodes under that are shared; but cvs2svn may be making a copy for
>every node in a copied tree.
>
>

I think that's what it's doing, yes; lots and lots of unneeded directory
metadata there!

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org