[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PROPOSAL] Merging Improved

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-04-11 19:50:20 CEST

> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:brane@xbc.nu]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 5:41 PM

>> Sander Striker wrote:
>>>>> Oh, yes: one other thing to worry about here are dump/load cycles. If
>>>>> you use node id's instead of paths, then the dumper has to convert them
>>>>> to paths and the loader has to convert back, because node IDs aren't
>>>>> preserved across a reload.
>> But that won't help for remote repositories. You don't even know when a
>> remote repository will be dumped/loaded and you might be stuck with IDs
>> that are invalid afterwards.
> Or we could simply declare that the UUID defines the repository; if the
> UUID changes, it's arguably no longer the same repository (and such a
> change would cause problems for more than just merges, anyway). That's
> why "svnadmin load" has an option to restore the UUID from the dump file.

With IDs I was referring to NODECHANGE ids.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 11 19:51:08 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.