Re: svndumpfilter - rfc.

Fine. If people want to be pedantic, then we'll say "RFC822-ish".

-g

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:00:36PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 11:24, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > My understanding of RFC 822 parser was this:
>
> Sadly, people who write mail user agents often have a similar level of
> understanding.
>
> Our dump format looks a little bit like RFC 822. It probably isn't
> precisely compatible in either direction. That's just fine with me; I
> don't think RFC 822 is a very good standard once you get into the
> details.
>
> > * notice if one of the headers is "Content-length:"
>
> Content-Length is from HTTP, not RFC 822 or 2822.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org