Re: svndumpfilter - rfc.

Paul Lussier <pll@lanminds.com> writes:

> In a message dated: 09 Apr 2003 21:08:20 CDT
> Ben Collins-Sussman said:
>
> >(On the other hand, we *did* make it RFC822 compatible. So python
> >probably has a module to parse it already. :-) )
>
> Maybe this is a stupid question, maybe not, but why RFC822 and not
> RFC2822, which has since superceded RFC822? Was is just easier to
> implement 822 compliance, and the assumption was that this should
> satisfy the 80/20 rule? Or was it just an oversight and no one
> remembered 2822 (which wouldn't surprise me, since it's no where near
> as famous as 822 :)

RFC 2822? Huh?

/me looks at gstein quizzically...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 10 17:07:13 2003