[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: isn't variance adjusted patching horribly dangerous?

From: Lars Segerlund <lars.segerlund_at_comsys.se>
Date: 2003-04-10 10:59:45 CEST

  Where is this doc referenced, I would like to find it :-).

  / Lars Segerlund.

Tom Lord wrote:
snip
>
> You need not. Kfogel's document contains some examples. Mentioning
> the existence of such examples is a logical non-sequitor.
>
> Another example of where v.a.p. will silently and incorrectly supress
> a desirable conflict would be the ordering of two function calls.
>
snip
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 10 11:00:42 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.