[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: isn't variance adjusted patching horribly dangerous?

From: Jack Repenning <jrepenning_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-04-10 02:41:45 CEST

Serkey said:
> [quote of Philip's adjoining changes example]
> I'd like the system to generate a conflict here, I really do.
> Wouldn't you?

I certainly would like a conflict in the case of adjoining deltas (this
is a common case of widening, which I just wrote about in another

I once had this discussion with another merge implementer. He pointed
out "if this were a wedding invitation list, there would be no
conflict." I asked him if there was much money to be made in
version-control of wedding lists....

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 10 02:42:32 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.