[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn diff segfault (issue 1093 again?)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-04-07 19:22:31 CEST

Robert Pluim <rpluim@bigfoot.com> writes:
> Everything seems ok, except:
> rpluim: ~/wc-test/local-wc1/foo
> $ svn diff -r 27 1001-moved
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> rpluim: ~/wc-test/local-wc1/foo
> This is coming from subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c:1227, where we do:
> SVN_ERR (convert_to_url (&URL1, path1, pool));
> /* Trickiness: possibly split up path2 into anchor/target. If
> we do so, then we must split URL1 as well. We shouldn't go
> assuming that URL1 is equal to path2's URL, as we used to. */
> SVN_ERR (svn_wc_get_actual_target (path2, &anchor, &target, pool));
> if (target)
> {
> svn_path_split (URL1, &url_anchor, &url_target, pool);
> And surprise, surprise, URL1 is NULL, since path1 was a moved file.
> I'm not sure of the best way to handle this. convert_to_url can't
> give me the actual previous URL, because that's rev-dependent. Giving
> back the URL as it was just prior to the move would work in 90% of the
> cases, but would fail dismally if the file has been moved more than
> once. Issue 1093 seems to classify this as an 'annoyance', so maybe I
> should close my eyes and ignore it :)

No, a segfault is never ignorable :-). Can you file an issue for
this? It should be pre-1.0, and separate from 1093 (though it may
want to reference 1093)...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 7 20:05:01 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.