=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>
> >I don't have time or proper state to test this change, but I suspect
> >it can be committed as-is, since the only effective difference is that
> >XPMs and XBMs will no long show up as binary. As such, I don't think
> >this will affect the test suite at all (unless we use XPM and XBM
> >mime-types somewhere in there).
> >
>
> I don't think we do, but:
>
> XPM and XBM are those weird text encodings for bitmaps, right? As such,
> they're nominally mergeable, but I strongly doubt you'd want to allow
> automatic merging there (IIRC the size of the bitmap is encoded in the
> text, for example). So these should in fact be handled as non-mergeable
> (i.e., not text) types.
Interesting ... and yet unrelated to the work I did. If there are
concerns about svn_mime_type_is_binary(), whatever. I was only
querying for input about my new *use* of that function.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 4 01:06:46 2003