Re: Safe to remove apr_file_flush?

Michael Wood wrote:

>On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:17:10PM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
>
>
>>Blair Zajac wrote:
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>
>>>So, I'm wondering if it's safe to remove code in util.c, because the
>>>netware, os2 filestat.c's don't call apr_file_flush.
>>>
>>>
>>They don't? Hmmm. Tell you what, since Subversion doesn't run on
>>Netware or OS/2 right now, let's just remove this flush, and file a
>>bug against APR. It's bound to be fixed soon.
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>What are the chances of getting the Subversion client running on
>Netware? Of course, Netware seems to make use of various configuration
>interfaces to configure it instead of just storing stuff in text files.
>At least that's the way it appears based on my limited Netware
>experience.
>
>

I really haven't the slightest idea. I've never even seen a Netware box.
All I know is that APR runs on Netware, and probably so does httpd. I
don't know about Berkeley DB or Neon, or apr-iconv, either.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org