Re: Crazy 5-step plan to remove the cached pristine copy

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:19, Branko Èibej wrote:
>
>
>>Ah! So glad to hear that ra_svn, the delta combiner, Bill Tutt's FS
>>schema rewrite, etc. are small things. Now I'm scared; is the Big One
>>gonna get me? :-)
>>
>>
>
>ra_svn was specifically excepted because it didn't disrupt existing
>code.
>
>The delta combiner was an important performance fix, not a user-visible
>feature.
>
>The schema rewrite, if I understand right, is a bug fix--also not a
>user-visible feature.
>
>
Quite a few user-visible features, if correctness can be called that.
But neve mind. Improving WC handing is also an important performance
fix, don't you think?

Don't misunderstand -- I'm not arguing *for* mucking with the WC library
in this way right now; all I'm saying is that "feature freeze" is a very
weak argument, given what has already gone in since then. Lots of
user-visible changes (like "svn ls" and "svn cat", if I'm not mistaken).

-- 
Brane Èibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org