Re: svndumpfilter - rfc.
From: William Uther <willu_at_cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: 2003-03-14 00:25:20 CET
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 09:22 PM, Alexander Sabourenkov wrote:
> Having almost no response to previous posting, and having
I'm very interested in this functionality. I haven't had time to look
> Should I turn subcommands back into options (keeping in mind that
Doesn't matter either way to me. I think the real question becomes:
> Should parser recalculate & verify MD5 sums?
I have no strong preference in whether the parser verifies the MD5 sums.
The parser should NOT 'fix' MD5 sums if they are incorrect. (I don't
> Has retaining original revision numbers when some revisions get dropped
I would not renumber. If I refer to revision numbers in the logs then
Thanks for the program :).
Will :-}
-- Dr William Uther National ICT Australia Phone: +61 2 9385 6926 School of Computer Science and Engineering Email: willu@cse.unsw.edu.au University of New South Wales Jabber: willu@jabber.cse.unsw.edu.au Sydney, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Mar 14 00:26:00 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.