Re: Getting complete revision history with the current DB model

Harald Wellmann <Harald.Wellmann@gmx.de> writes:

> There was a remark in the 0.19 release notes about "adding support for
> multiple fs backends" - what would that be? I didn't notice any
> significant changes in the libsvn_fs sources - I was expecting some
> sort of abstraction for all the svn_fs__bdb* function calls.

Oops, that release note was just plain wrong. Some work was done
toward paving the way for pluggable backends, but the actual FS
abstraction work is being done on a branch, not in the main
development line.

> What's the current status of SQL support? Vague ideas, solid
> requirements, active development on a dedicated branch...?

Glenn Thompson has a very well-defined plan, the design docs for which
he is polishing up right now for public consumption. He's done alot
of the work, too, but those changes aren't yet committed to the
branch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 13 23:21:09 2003