[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: issue #1169 patch strategy

From: Matt Kraai <kraai_at_alumni.cmu.edu>
Date: 2003-03-07 22:17:17 CET

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:18:05PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu> writes:
> > Should I continue to implement issue #1169 one function at a time,
> > or should I add pools to all of the remaining functions at once?
>
> The one-at-a-time way is slightly easier to review, but if it causes
> you much inconvenience, then just do it all at once. No big deal
> either way, IMHO.

It's going to be slow to find someone to test each of the
remaining thirteen functions with ra_dav. OK to test each patch
with just ra_local and ra_svn?

Matt

-- 
Oink!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 7 22:16:56 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.