> From: Matt Kraai [mailto:kraai@ftbfs.org]On Behalf Of Matt Kraai
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:33 PM
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:38:51PM -0600, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu> writes:
> > > Should I continue to implement issue #1169 one function at a time,
> > > or should I add pools to all of the remaining functions at once?
> >
> > Well, you can start with the RA->get_dir() patch I posted to the list
> > (but couldn't test over DAV because ... well, everyone knows why by
> > now, I guess). Beyond that, I think I'd still like to see the changes
> > happen with per-RA-function granularity. Makes the reviewing simpler.
>
> OK, in that case, would someone please test the following patch
> with ra_dav? It adds a pool argument to RA->get_dated_revision().
>
> I'll take up your RA->get_dir() patch next.
Running make davcheck.
Get back to you in a bit (a longish bit...).
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 7 21:53:46 2003