[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: issue #1169 patch strategy

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-03-07 20:38:51 CET

Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu> writes:

> Howdy,
>
> Should I continue to implement issue #1169 one function at a time,
> or should I add pools to all of the remaining functions at once?

Well, you can start with the RA->get_dir() patch I posted to the list
(but couldn't test over DAV because ... well, everyone knows why by
now, I guess). Beyond that, I think I'd still like to see the changes
happen with per-RA-function granularity. Makes the reviewing simpler.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 7 20:40:45 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.