Re: Okay, plan for 0.19 release

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:03:51AM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> So, for 0.19:
>
> 1. In trunk, put in the prop relaxation (using NE_XML_VALID). This
> is trivial. Ben is doing it right now.
>
> 2. Make the release branch, and on that branch, revert revision
> 5202, and apply MBK's server-side change to not send UUIDs.
>

This is fine-by-me.

I ran into problems with hacking in an HTTP-headers based UUID transmission;
sending them is easy, the question is picking them up. It looks like most
of the ra_dav functions that actually have access to neon request objects don't
also have access to the session baton. I've hardly done an exaustive
search, but I'm wondering if this was by design (it's not such a bad idea).
I don't want to change any function interfaces for temporary hacks if
I can help it. I could simply call neon directly, I guess...

This difficulty made me reconsider the HTTP-headers approach entirely, in
favor of Brane's suggestion to transmit the UUIDs as normal custom properties
for now.

I am unsure how best to proceed; recommendations are welcome.

--ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 7 18:55:24 2003