[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PATCH] Issue 990: swigutil_py.c.diff

From: Dale Hirt <dale_at_sbcltd.com>
Date: 2003-03-06 17:48:35 CET

AFAIK, it should still be valid, because no one has touched swigutil_py.c in
the interim. I have been hoping that someone will look over the patch, and
tell me if it's crap or not.

Feedback, please.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sander Roobol [mailto:phy@wanadoo.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 5:00 AM
> To: Dale Hirt
> Cc: Subversion Development Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 990: swigutil_py.c.diff
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Dale Hirt wrote:
> > So,
> >
> > Here is my first patch against swigutil_py.c. I added in
> two functions,
> > svn_swig_py_get_osfhandle and svn_swig_py_valid_fhandle, to
> factor out the
> > OS-dependent portions.
>
> Is this patch still valid? If so, can someone look into it?
>
> Sander
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 6 17:50:04 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.